Kirchnerism disappears and the opposition does not take responsibility for its previous failure

“The fatherland is a snake shedding its skin”. I think I remember what he said Leopold Marshal, at least it serves me for what I’m trying to express and I hope it will happen. in our reality some believed they had defeated the ideologized human rights dictatorship. Ten thousand missing is too high a figure to be easily forgotten. Guerrilla violence was as far removed from social justice as dictatorship was from the order the country needed. Raul Alfonsin will attempt a social-democratic solution, carlos menen economically, it will be much more destructive than the dictatorship itself. The Kirchners develop two different stages, the first of breeder where he installs an essentially personal conception of power proclaiming “I am the state”and after Christina which straddles a foreign history where he perceives Marxism as the overcoming of Peronism. I specify that they use Marxism to justify themselves and not because they imagine that a political direction is necessary.

History exposes our so-called right, makes clear they were one collection of strokes, and that in their last stage they conceived of themselves as “the vanguard of the West”; such facts reveal the madness of the Malvinas war as well as its unlimited decision to kill. His so-called economic liberalism has nothing to do with freedom. General Perón evokes the ABC, Argentina, Brazil and Chile while this decadent right takes the brotherly countries as a hypothesis of war. The Catholic Church, which disturbs its affairs so much, saved us from a war with our brothers in Chile whose consequences were unthinkable. In 1974, a group of deputies traveled to London sent by Perón to discuss integration with the Malvinas. Afterwards, we were invited to the islands and a group of Malvinas accompanied us on a Greek-flagged ship, contemplating a firm future integration.

This memory is beyond me, it becomes difficult for me to recover it. This general who returns from eighteen years of exile, is forced to integrate guerrilla violence, beloved daughter of continuous dictatorships and not as an irresponsible founded by his letters tries to explain. Alfonsin, in my opinion, it tries to push radicalism too far to the left, and weakens it in its structure. Menem takes advantage of this situation and destroy the nation state, as radical as Peronist, and abandons himself to the new right which sees in social justice a simple “spillover” of the newly enriched. breeder imposes itself as a power over business, and strictly speaking, he is associated with a society of unproductive companies which only shares and participates as a main partner in the corruption invented by Menem and the new businessmen and trade unionists. This initial Kirchnerism is based on income from power, so much so that it doubles the game just as a way to double bribes. Let’s not forget that later, Macri take advantage of this system, like all the rest of the corruption installed to replace the industrial society that the radicals, the Peronists and even the putschists of the past had created. The dictatorship’s killings were primarily aimed at destroying the conscience of the state, an idea of ​​the nation that few questioned. If Menismism was liberal betrayal, Kirchnerism will be the decadent Marxist betrayal, the one who today is lost in the government of the day and has no thinkers who are not heirs to the class hatred which has never been our proposal.

It is difficult for a society impoverished like few others to can easily swipe right, as absurd as Macri does not understand this simple reality. The sad thing is that the liberalism of the rich is today more coherent than the statism of the bureaucrats. It is difficult to find a thought in the midst of so many denunciations. Denouncing the lethargy of the capacity to think, reduces the head of its actors like this tribe of “jibaros”.

Cristina and Macri are two heirs, with all the limitations that the bearers of the glory of others. Nestor founded a force with strengths and weaknesses, Cristina only inherited the worst of this story. Franco Macri knew how to organize an economic empire, a character who came from below and who knew how to navigate through life. His son never failed and therefore did not even recognize his father’s wisdom. None of them takes responsibility for the crisis they caused or accompanied when society suffered a downfall unimaginable just a few decades ago. Kirchnerism disappears, the president does not take responsibility for his own emptiness and the opposition does not take responsibility for his previous failure. Government statism only serves its own bureaucracy, opposition privatism only implies business betterment. The homeland ended up being the space of their greed, of politics, of collective needs, no one cares. Radicals and Peronists today, there is no, a national thought as in the sister countries, with us is not valid. We have a lot of natural resources and energy in our youth to find a future that falls in love.

Only one project is missing, and for the moment, the candidates abound while the ideas are lacking. It’s time to reflect and resurface, everything is given. Politics needs rebellion, and that virtue is now being silenced by overpaid militancy. Better times will come.

Continue reading: