:quality(85)//cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/L5E33WK3P5EBPL45KLE3YBQCVY.jpg "'I'm going to keep doing it': Ricardo Monreal defends his meeting with INE and groups against AMLO's plan B 1")
Through a video on his social networks, the senator and president of the Political Coordination Council (Jucopo), Ricardo Montreal reaffirmed that the Senate It must be a body of measurement and consensus that dialogues with everyone.
The structure of the INE decreases drastically with Plan B: Lorenzo Córdova launched the criticisms of the Senate
Ricardo Monreal, along with the rest of Jucopo, received the President of INE to discuss AMLO’s electoral reform
This after a meeting was held the previous days between the Jucopo and the advisers of the National Electoral Institute (INE), between them, Lorenzo Cordoba Vianello as well as with groups that oppose the changes to secondary electoral laws envisaged in the Plan B.
The meetings took place on February 9 and 10, respectively, during which Córdova Vianello argued that if Plan B were implemented, the Institute would lose its ability to act due to the cuts and limitations that these reforms entail.
Ricardo Monreal confirmed his meeting with Lorenzo Córdova and civil organizations against plan B
Before the stage of the legislative process, the coordinator of Morena could only propose to listen to the president of the INE and the citizens dissatisfied with the electoral reform AMLO
Due to the reunion, Moreal was again criticized because his loyalty to the National Regeneration Movement (Movimiento Regeneración Nacional) was questioned.Morena), since the INE was one of the organizations most criticized by Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), and of the party in general, accusing him of being biased and of promoting the opposition bloc.
Given this, Senator Morenista shared his position through his social networks in which he assured that the Senate you have to be tolerant and talk to all parties for the good of Mexico.
How Plan B affects the elections, according to the INE
The institution has taken on the task of explaining in depth what the approval of the electoral reform could entail
In the audiovisual, he recounted some of the activities carried out throughout the week, including the visit of the INE adviser and representatives of 86 civil groups to communicate the impacts that could be due to the approval of Plan B.
And in it he justified the meeting by alleging that the Senate should “hear all the voicesand be a measuring body.
“The Senate must receive everyone, the Senate must listen to all voices, the Senate must become what it has been and has been historically: an organ of constitutional measurement, of prudence, an organ of control. That’s why you should receive everyone.”
Later, he assured that it does not take away from people their principles or their beliefs, but that it teaches them tolerate and respect everyone. “I will continue to do like this: talk to everyonesit down with everyone and find what is best for Mexico”.
“Our movement, which is universal, which integrates with all beliefs and ideologies and which integrates with a position of democratic advance and, above all, with an organ of social sensitivity”
According to footage provided by the Senate itself, the leaders were also present Miguel Angel Osorio, from the PRI; For Julen Forgeronbread ; Miguel Angel Mancera, of the PRD; And Clement Castanedaby MC.
In addition, there is Senator Xóchitl Gálvez of PAN and the 11 members of the INE Technical Council. Likewise, both before and during the meeting, he assured that he was not in a position to intervene in the ratification of Plan B.
They also presented a report in which the electoral body explained how these amendments to the General Law on Electoral Institutions and Procedures (LGIPE), general of the political parties (LGPP) and Organization of the Judiciary (LOPJ) and the promulgation of the general law on the means of contestation in electoral matters (LGMIME) would have a negative impact on the INE.
It should be noted that on that day, INE filed an action for unconstitutionality against Plan B before the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) where they maintained that there had been violated the legislative processthe actions that INE could carry out were limited and accused the ice party of committing fraud Against law.