Franco Velazco has recounted the details of the incidents in the match played on Sunday, February 19.

sports university lost 1-2 against Lima Covenant in a new edition of the classic. In recent hours, the “compadres” have denounced each other for inappropriate behavior and lack of security guarantees. franco velazcolegal adviser to thecreams‘, mentioned that thenarrowThey still remember this sentence and that it “marked” them. Furthermore, he suggested that the directive “white blue‘ should focus on other matters concerning the club.

The differences between the two go back a long time, when John Ferraripresident of theYou meringues‘, He said of the great economy of his classic rival. The former footballer commented that the institution ‘student‘ does not have the portfolio of ‘Blue and white‘.

“You have to clarify a question, mainly in forms. Yesterday, formally, by the table of the parts of the ‘U’, We received a notarized letter from Alianza Lima. We do not know if it is directed against the Universitario de Deportes as an institution and legal person or if it is in a personal capacity against Jean Ferrari”, he declared in the program Todas las Voces del Fútbol.

“They are asking for the correction of this famous number of the famous wallet. It is clear to us that we have caused trauma to the people of Alianza with the question of the wallet. It is clear to us that they are going to have to resort to the field of psychology to mentally recover,” he said.

“Beyond that and the jokes, it’s just an anecdote. There is no damage in the objective or subjective aspect to any official and less to the institution of Alianza Lima. Unfortunately, they have activated a legal issue and we are going to have to respond in the corresponding legal terms,” ​​he said.

“I advance it: we are not going to rectify ourselves at all. On the contrary, by using the same terms as Alianza, We will also submit a letter requesting rectification. Some of its delegates, through their social networks, also make inaccurate statements on behalf of the administrators, on behalf of the institution and on behalf of Jean Ferrari”, argued Velazco.

Alex Valera couldn't break Alianza Lima's defense.  (GEC)
Alex Valera couldn’t break Alianza Lima’s defense. (GEC)

Velazco He also recounted the provocations they carried out Paul Sabbag there Carlos Zambrano. The lawyer of thecreams‘ said they had presented their complaint to the Disciplinary Commission of the Peruvian Football Federation. He also explained that these actions are a bad example for younger fans.

“It also follows a process. I understand that the Disciplinary Commission of the Federation, with this document already formally received by the club, will begin an investigation process. The evidence we presented will be important”, commented the legal adviser of the ‘you‘.

“In reality, the facts are objective, there is not much to analyze. There have been very specific acts of provocation that unfortunately end up tainting a sporting event. They end up inciting and generating violence. Our country does not need more acts of violence. The worst thing that can happen to us is to defile the sporting part. It should be a space of good example for children, young people and adolescents,” he stressed.

The conduct of these players also reflects what the leadership of Alianza Lima is today.. Instead of talking and warning and generating calm, what they did was basically generate that kind of tension. Surely they did it to stop the game and then ask for it at the table. These are reprehensible things that should not happen on a football pitch.”

Such Sabbagh as Zambrano They were part of the controversy over the gestures they made in the classic. After scoring the game’s first goal, the Colombian striker celebrated by putting his hands behind his ears, pretending not to listen to the opposing fans. In the case of ‘Leon‘, after being sent off for a hard tackle at Piero Quispemakes a hand gesture of the letter U upside down.

Categorized in: