:quality(85)//cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/IXMQHHTCKNCMVE35R5QKUELVTE.jpg "Prosecutor Chávez Cotrina assured that the VIDENA authorities had ignored the demands")
Jorge Wayner Chavez CotrinaAttorney General and National Coordinator of Specialized Prosecutors Against Organized Crime, spoke this Thursday, March 2 at the National Sports Village (VIDENA) and revealed that the research process became efficient because Peruvian Football Federation (FPF) he failed to meet the deadlines for submitting a series of documents.
Agustín Lozano, Edwin Oviedo and Manuel Burga: corruption in the Peruvian Football Federation lately
The last presidents of the highest entity of Peruvian football have been involved in different legal problems, and in some cases even FIFA had to intervene.
“The Court and the Special Tribunal ordered a search of the VIDENA, so that the Organized Crime Prosecutor’s Office, which investigated alleged criminal acts, seize the documentation that was requested by the Prosecutor at the time“, said Chávez in a dialogue with Radio Ovación.
Likewise, he made public the reason why the authorities came to VIDENA. “Despite the fact that the Prosecutor made the request in time and through the corresponding procedural mechanisms, The VIDENA authorities have never paid attention to these requirements”.
Position of Hernán Barcos on the conflict between Alianza Lima and the FPF for TV rights
The “blue and white” striker regretted the situation in which Peruvian football finds itself today. Moreover, he pointed out that the team is already thinking about the duel against UTC.
However, he explained that the act was carried out with the aim of obtaining the documents necessary for the opening of the investigation. “Consequently, The prosecutor was obliged to ask the investigating judge to carry out a search for the purpose of seizing documentsThat’s what’s happening.”
Regarding the time it will take to collect the documents, the Prosecutor stated the following:The raid will take the necessary timewhat is important is that the Prosecutor can collect the information he deems necessary for this investigation.
Felipe Cantuarias criticized Agustín Lozano and his lack of leadership to resolve the dispute over television rights
The governance representative at FIFA also mentioned that the federation had lost credibility due to its lack of transparency and integrity.
In addition, he announced who the people in charge of the research process are. “The doctor Orihuelawhat is it Provincial Attorney Against Permitted Crimes and also, he is accompanied by five supporting prosecutors.
He also added that “we don’t have a warrant for anyone’s arrestit is simply a research procedure to be able to dispose of the documents that the FPF did not submit to the Public Prosecutor’s Office in time”.
Finally, he clarified that the reason why the prosecutor in charge had to be present at VIDENA. “The mandate that the Prosecutor gave was shorter, but obviously today, given the need to have the documentation to be able to carry out the investigation, as established by the criteria, the Prosecutor had to take measures in this regard. regard.”
Intervention of the FPF headquarters for corruption investigation against Agustín Lozano | TV RPP
Problems persist for Peruvian Football Federation (FPF). On this occasion, SUNARP He showed his position regarding the recording of the registration of the holder of the highest regulatory entity of Peruvian football: Augustin Lozano.
From said entity, they indicate that the proper documentary process has not been carried out so that Lozano be recognized and formalized as the main leader of the FPFaccepting the task that had previously been requested.
It should be noted that the defendant will have three working days to appeal or otherwise the verdict will not be changed. This would generate that Augustin Lozano unable to perform his duties as President of the federation.
“Keep in mind that by Resolution No. | 553-2016-SUNARP-TR-L of 03/16/2016, the Registry Court established that… The title must be specially crossed out by presenting a copy, always when an annotation of a judicial decision is requested and a simple copy of it is presented.…”, can we read in the document.
“Consequently, the formality of the official letter and the copies certified true by the legal assistant having not been respected, as required by law, we are in the normative hypothesis referred to in article 43 -A of the general regulation of public registers transcribed above and which prohibits access to the register“, continue.