:quality(85)//cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/DCSJZZQGZRC77LA7DSR3RG5KQI.jpg "Pati Chapoy said he was the victim of an injustice after an alleged arrest warrant")
On Friday, March 17, it was reported that Pati Chapoy, Daniel Bisogno, Ricardo Manjarrez there stone alone they would have been the subject of an arrest warrant against them, for which they would have requested an amparo. During the transmission of windowing On March 20, the drivers already revealed everything that happened.
In the middle of the show program, Daniel Need He explained that none is the subject of legal proceedings for having broken the law, on the contrary, he assured that he and his colleagues would be victims of an injustice which limits their work as communicators.
“The case is not related to the commission of a crime and the execution of an arrest warrant, but arises from the restriction of journalistic practice on the information that was presented here in Ventaneando,” the presenter mentioned.
For its part, Where is Chapoy? He mentioned that the situation started because of a note in the program; Although she did not specify which, she explained that a person would have been upset because they showed “the plaintiff and the defendant”, the communicator mentioned that it was his duty to report on both positions in all circumstances.
Furthermore, he announced that as soon as the legal situation is over, will explicitly mention what is the note that triggered the problem:
“Later when it’s over – which will be over almost immediately – we’re going to report what happened, that was a note that Ventaneando posted showing both sides, because we’re a way to journalistic investigation and when in a note, a report or an interview, we have the obligation to put the part which denounces and the part denounced, this is what bothered a certain person of whom I cannot tell you give the name.
Since the rumors spread, we have made sure that the person complaining could be Gaby Spanicfor four months, she has been criticized by Pati after her sister Daniela was victim by a offensive after leaving a oxxo, However, this is information that has not been confirmed and does not coincide with the description offered by the entertainment reporter.
In addition, the journalist in front of the evening show launched a message in favor of freedom of expression, echoing what her colleagues were saying, since the restriction would limit her information work:
“And like 27 years ago, we will once again defend the freedom of expression of all of us who practice journalism in this country, especially in Ventaneando. We will continue to defend as we have done for 30 years the freedom of speechnot from this program but from all that we have here in Aztec“, said.
On the other hand, drivers windowing They confirmed that there was an order from a federal judge for them to be arrested for 36 hours and they also mentioned that they had obtained an injunction to avoid this measure.
And it is that according to the windowing presentersnone were warned of what might happen if they failed to adhere to certain restrictions.
“There has been speculation about our legal situation, but as this is an ongoing process, we cannot provide the context and details of the injustice we have suffered,” he said. explain. Daniel Need at the beginning of the message.
It was on March 16 that the drivers brought an action for amparo against the 36 hours of arrestall in relation to the note they will not be able to talk about, at least temporarily.
“A judge without sufficient grounds has ordered various measures that restrict the right to freedom of expression and our journalistic exercise, prohibiting us from continuing to present information on a particular subject, derived from a alleged violation to these measures, the judge ordered us to stop for 36 hours without our having prior knowledge of the measures and the consequences of non-compliance,” said Daniel Bisogno.