The former head of the Ministry of Social Development (Sedesol), Rosario Robles Berlanga, announced that since September 2022 the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) allegedly determined that the head of the office of the Attorney General of the Republic (FGR), The way of Alexander Gertzviolated his presumption of innocence.
Through her official Twitter account, the former official said that almost six months later she learned of the sentence the commission had handed down in her case, after her family and her defense filed a request for allegation violation of human rights by being imprisoned for more than three years without the start of the trial.
Also, in your post, Robles Berlanga asked the Chamber of Deputies to actas requested by the CNDH to let you know what has been analyzed or discussed on your question regarding the powers granted to you in the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States (CPEUM).
“Today I learned by email that since 09/22 the @CNDH ruled that the prosecutor #GertzManero violated my presumption of innocence. Here is the document addressed to the @MX_Diputados so that they act in accordance with their powers. I want to know what has been done in this regard in the said sentence “, could we read this Wednesday, March 7.
In a second message, Rosario Robles pointed out that the condemnation of the National Human Rights Commission was based on the resolution issued by the Ninth Collegiate Courtwhich granted him an amparo on September 30, 2021, which also contemplated the protection of federal justice.
It is under the same tenor that the former Head of Government of the former Federal District directly appointed the President of the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Deputies, Santiago Creil Miranda, to analyze the document sent by the commission and act accordingly on your case.
“The @CNDH is based on what was resolved by the 9th Collegiate Court which grants me protection because the Prosecutor #Gertz violated my rights. Based on this, he sends this letter to @MX_Diputados. MP @SantiagoCreelM I ask you to analyze this document and act accordingly”
In the meantime, in the documents presented by the former official, it was possible to read that what the CNDH had done was to confirm the decision approved by the Court that granted him an amparo and the protection of federal justice by indirect amparo trial 348/2021-III while Robles Berlanga was still in prison; however, it issued no opinion, but instead asked the Chamber of Deputies to analyze the matter.
“In the above-mentioned sentence, it was stated that the current head of the FGR refrained from safeguarding the information relating to the complainant, contained in the investigation, and its leakage through its dissemination, is a violation of the fundamental right of the presumption of innocenceas a rule of trafficking in its extra-procedural aspect, provided for in Article 20, Section B, Section I, of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States in relation to the different 7 and 8, of the American Convention on Human Rights of man”, one could read.
As we could read, the CNDH before rendering any judgment demanded that the Lower House “give a hearing” on the casebased on what is established in Article 93 of the Constitution, as well as 41 of the Organic Law of the General Congress of the United Mexican States, in addition to 204 of the Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies.
Finally, the committee said they would continue to provide care to the former officialfor which they asked San Lázaro to report on the progress of the efforts.